首页> 外文OA文献 >The Investment Process for Capital Investments : The case of industrial energy-efficiency investments and non-energy benefits
【2h】

The Investment Process for Capital Investments : The case of industrial energy-efficiency investments and non-energy benefits

机译:资本投资的投资过程:以工业节能投资和非能源收益为例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Capital investments play a crucial role for the business of every firm. In an industrial context, energy efficiency is an important means to meet future energy needs and in the same time reduce climate impact. In this thesis, the investment process for capital investments is therefore studied by addressing the case of industrial capital investments improving energy efficiency. The thesis specifically aims to illuminate how additional benefits, i.e. non-energy benefits, are and can be acknowledged in the investment process by applying an ex-ante perspective. The thesis holds the decision-making process as unit of analysis and aims to contribute with insights on firm level. Especially in an energy-efficiency context, such a process perspective has only been scarcely applied. The thesis is based on a literature review and two empirical studies. The literature review is the starting point of the thesis and reviews the literature on benefit concepts and investment behaviour of energy-efficiency investments. It is then followed by an explorative study in which thirteen industrial Swedish firms are interviewed on how they consider non-energy benefits. Investment motives and critical aspects for adopting energy-efficiency investments are also addressed. It also includes a questionnaire, distributed and collected during a networking event for energy-intensive firms within Swedish manufacturing industry. The second empirical study is a case study conducted at a Swedish pulp and paper firm. It aims to take a comprehensive perspective on the investment process as well as to analyse how and when non-energy benefits are acknowledged in the investment process. This case study approach  enables participants at different levels in the organisation to be engaged in the study and new perspectives to be addressed. The results indicate a general investment process passing through the phases identification, development and selection. Investment motives, information, internal coordination and external actors appear as key aspects of the investment process. Energy-efficiency investments are primarily initiated due to cost-savings motives. However, the subsequent investment process appears as consistent for all investment categories; the investment process described here is thus not specific for energy-efficiency investments only. The results instead indicate an investment process influenced by investment size; it influences the extent to which information is collected and assessed before making the decision, i.e. level of procedural rationality, as well as how the investment project is coordinated within the firm. Last, suppliers are involved in the investment process to a large extent from an early stage. Regarding non-energy benefits, the results indicate that various benefits have been observed but far from all are acknowledged in the investment process. They are to a larger extent acknowledged for larger investments when more resources are devoted to the investment process. Quantifiable non-energy benefits improve the business case for energy-efficiency investments and non-energy benefits should thus be quantified to the extent possible. Yet, nonenergy benefits characterised by a lower level of quantifiability could still be important, such as benefits related to work environment, and should therefore be considered. However, the findings indicate a frequent use and reliance upon an investment manual, implicating a need for simplicity when addressing the additional benefits. This indicates that there should be an emphasis on a limited number of main benefits, rather than seeking to acknowledge all possible benefits.
机译:资本投资对于每个公司的业务都起着至关重要的作用。在工业环境中,能源效率是满足未来能源需求并同时减少气候影响的重要手段。因此,本文通过探讨提高能源效率的工业资本投资案例研究资本投资的投资过程。本文的目的特别是阐明通过应用事前观点如何在投资过程中确认额外的收益,即非能源收益。本文将决策过程作为分析单位,旨在为企业层面的见解做出贡献。尤其是在能源效率的背景下,这种过程的观点很少被应用。本文基于文献综述和两项实证研究。文献综述是本文的出发点,是对节能投资收益概念和投资行为的文献综述。然后是一项探索性研究,其中对13家瑞典工业公司进行了采访,探讨了他们如何考虑非能源效益。还讨论了采用节能投资的投资动机和关键方面。它还包括一份调查表,该调查表是在网络活动期间为瑞典制造业内的能源密集型公司分发和收集的。第二项实证研究是在瑞典纸浆和造纸公司进行的案例研究。它旨在对投资过程进行全面的分析,并分析如何以及何时在投资过程中确认非能源收益。这种案例研究方法使组织中不同级别的参与者可以参与研究并应对新的观点。结果表明,一般的投资过程需要经过阶段的确定,开发和选择。投资动机,信息,内部协调和外部参与者似乎是投资过程的关键方面。节能投资的开始主要是出于节省成本的动机。但是,随后的投资过程似乎对所有投资类别都是一致的;因此,此处描述的投资过程并不仅仅针对节能投资。相反,结果表明投资过程受投资规模的影响;它会影响决策之前收集和评估信息的程度,即程序合理性的水平,以及公司内部投资项目的协调方式。最后,供应商从一开始就在很大程度上参与了投资过程。关于非能源收益,结果表明已观察到各种收益,但在投资过程中并没有充分认识到所有收益。当更多的资源用于投资过程时,它们在更大程度上被认可用于更大的投资。可量化的非能源收益改善了节能投资的商业案例,因此,非能源收益应尽可能地量化。但是,具有较低可量化性的非能源效益仍然很重要,例如与工作环境有关的效益,因此应予以考虑。但是,调查结果表明,经常使用和依赖投资手册,这意味着在解决其他好处时需要简化。这表明应该强调有限的主要利益,而不是寻求承认所有可能的利益。

著录项

  • 作者

    Rasmussen, Josefine;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号